Remembering Humphrey's accomplishments Eric Black Star Tribune Sunday, June 3, 2001 Civil rights. Medicare. The war on poverty. Federal aid to education. Name a major goal of U.S. liberalism during its heyday in the 1960s and '70s -- with the notable exception of opposition to the Vietnam War -- and Hubert Humphrey was for it, hammer and tongs and arms waving. But the liberal consensus that Humphrey helped create and rode to his greatest legislative achievements -- the belief that the power and money of the federal government should be deployed against our most intractable social problems -- shattered during the 1980s and '90s as many Americans became skeptical of government's ability to solve big problems at an acceptable cost. Humphrey's name is on our domed stadium and the charter terminal at our airport. A statue of him, his mouth open in characteristic full-throated argument, guards the entrance of Minneapolis City Hall, where he served as mayor. But the most famous of Humphrey's political proteges, Walter Mondale, worries that people who remember Humphrey's name are forgetting what Humphrey stood for, what a dominant force he was during his lifetime, what a stamp he put on Minnesota, how "he demonstrated what one person can do, if they are engaged, energetic and skilled, and how we need that today." Humphrey died in 1978, physically devoured by cancer and politically diminished by his unsuccessful quests for the presidency and by the fading of the liberal consensus. Now, as Mondale pursues a public project in autobiography featuring lectures and panels about his 50 years in public life, he will devote the next chapter to his senior partner and friend. The chapter, called "Hubert," will be presented Thursday at the University of Minnesota. 'He was the best' In an interview last week at his Minneapolis law office, Mondale recalled that he was a Macalester College student in 1946 when he first encountered Humphrey, the dynamic young mayor of Minneapolis, giving a speech. Humphrey was "the best speaker of his time," Mondale said. Later, when television became the dominant medium of political communication, Humphrey's long, fervent stemwinders were out of fashion and he was sometimes mocked for his verbosity. "Television, that was a corner he never turned," Mondale said. "But at moving an audience as it was movable at that time, he was the best." Mondale was sufficiently moved to join the ranks of Humphrey's supporters, handed out literature for Humphrey's 1947 reelection and was thrilled in 1948 when Humphrey made his national breakthrough, at the Democratic National Convention. The platform committee had adopted a mushy civil rights plank, designed to avoid offending Southern delegates. Humphrey argued for a much stronger plank. "There are those who say to you, we are rushing this issue of civil rights," Humphrey cried. "I say we are 172 years late. There are those who say, this issue of civil rights is an infringement on states' rights. The time has arrived for the Democratic Party to get out of the shadow of states' rights and walk forthrightly into the bright sunshine of human rights." Humphrey's eight-minute speech, interrupted 20 times by applause, swayed the convention to adopt the stronger civil rights plank. As feared, it also inspired a walkout by Southern delegates, who formed a Dixiecrat Party and nominated Strom Thurmond, then the Democratic governor of South Carolina, as their presidential candidate. Later in his career, especially during his agonies over the Vietnam War and his own presidential candidacy, Humphrey tried to play the conciliator, seeking the words that would convince both sides that he was their ally. But the Humphrey of 1948 was the opposite. "Civil rights was perhaps the most important social revolution in our history," Mondale said. "You had to hit it straight on, and he did." When Humphrey was elected to the U.S. Senate, he became the leading advocate of civil rights and a prominent member of its growing liberal wing. The causes were many, but for Mondale, the key word that unites them is "community." Liberals wanted to marshal the resources of the community to help those who most needed it. Thanks to the liberal agenda, Mondale said, "millions of Americans who had been excluded from American society were finally given some chance to participate, particularly the minorities. We didn't eradicate poverty, but the lives of poor people were made far more tolerable. As part of this thrust, we completed the most comprehensive, dynamic, even incredible period of social change and legislative achievement in American history." Mondale said Humphrey ranks among the greatest, if not the greatest, senator of that era. In 1960, Humphrey sought the presidency for the first time, losing in the primaries to John F. Kennedy. Mondale was elected Minnesota attorney general. In 1964, President Lyndon Johnson chose Humphrey as his running mate. Humphrey badly wanted the job, believing it would enhance his chance of becoming president someday. Actually, his election to the vice presidency in the 1964 Democratic landslide marked the end of Humphrey's most productive period as a public servant, Mondale said. Johnson was "generally dreadful toward Humphrey," Mondale said. He remembers a picture of Humphrey in a cowboy hat on a horse at LBJ's ranch that seemed to symbolize, for Mondale, Johnson's determination to humiliate Humphrey. The usually joyous Humphrey, nobody's cowboy, looks miserable in the picture. The war His liberal admirers like to believe that Humphrey harbored strong doubts about the escalating U.S. involvement in Vietnam but kept them private out of loyalty to the administration and out of fear of what Johnson would do if he broke ranks. On the other hand, Humphrey had been a staunch Cold Warrior and firm anti-Communist. Mondale said he doesn't know Humphrey's true feelings about the war, but he knows that Humphrey gave Johnson a letter early in their term advising caution and urging rethinking of the war policy. Johnson, Mondale said, "turned on him," excluding Humphrey from the administration's inner circles. Humphrey's accession to the vice presidency was a big break for Mondale's career. He was appointed to serve out Humphrey's term and spent the next 12 years in the Senate. His relationship with Humphrey deepened during all these stages until "we were about as close as two politicians can be," Mondale said. Hobbled by the growing unpopularity of the war, Johnson decided not to seek reelection in 1968 and Humphrey sought the nomination, but Johnson's support for Humphrey was shaky, Mondale said. Johnson gave Humphrey no slack to act in the interests of his candidacy and warned that he would publicly denounce Humphrey if he strayed. Mondale said Humphrey searched for ways to enable anti-war Democrats to support him in the general election. Humphrey worked out a substitute plank for the Democratic platform that, while certainly not dovish, was an olive branch to the anti-war delegates, suggesting that Humphrey wanted to find an honorable end to the war and would look for new approaches, Mondale said. Secretary of State Dean Rusk and others had seen the language and approved it, but at the last minute "Johnson pulled it out from under us," Mondale said, forcing Humphrey to run on a platform that endorsed Johnson's war policy down the line. Delegations controlled by Johnson allies withheld their support from Humphrey in ways that left Mondale wondering whether Johnson might be plotting a last-minute comeback. In the end, Humphrey captured the nomination under circumstances, including violence between police and anti-war demonstrators outside the convention hall, that hurt him in the fall. Humphrey lost, narrowly, to Richard Nixon, who claimed to have a secret plan to end the war. Unhappy times Humphrey returned to the Senate in 1971 and served there until his death in 1978, but his second Senate career was not a happy period for him, Mondale said. He had lost his leadership position and his seniority, gained some political scars from the Vietnam issue and "some of his issues had lost steam," Mondale said. Humphrey's late-career frustrations were the beginning of a change in the country's attitude toward liberalism. Mondale speaks listlessly of these trends. "People got sour on government," he said. The landmark legislation of the liberal era has mostly survived attempts to dismantle it, he said, and still produces results. Mondale, for his part, hasn't changed his mind about the values and goals he shared with Humphrey. "I still think we were right," he said. "We were right to put these programs in place, and what we should be doing now is making them work." If Humphrey was still around, he might be searching for new ways to attack the problems that still exist, Mondale said, but "what I don't think we'd be hearing from him would be a message of retreating from looking on the nation as a community and trying to use government as a positive force to improve people's lives." -- Eric Black is at eblack@startribune.com